🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.