🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is saved on Snapchat, and suddenly they want us to fork out money for it."

Negative feedback and a sense of inequity have dominated social media conversations since Snapchat became the most recent tech firm to start charging for a feature that users previously accessed for at no cost.

The company behind Snapchat declared in last month that it would require payment from people if they have exceeding five gigabytes worth of archived photos and videos stored as the Memories feature.

Among numerous users, these past uploads act as a portal to bygone days – driving some to blast the company of "money-hungry tactics" in posts on online platforms and unfavorable ratings on mobile app marketplaces.

Available Solutions

Snap has equated its paid storage plans to those offered by major companies for handsets.

And as an alternative for individuals avoiding fees, members can download their archived media – which for certain users span tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

Snap indicated that only a minority of subscribers would be influenced by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "always challenging to shift from using a feature without cost to subscribing to it" – but implied it would be "a valuable investment" for members.

Numerous denouncing the move on the internet clearly oppose this view.

User Backlash

A digital campaign dubbed the cost a "memory tax", with users labeling it "dystopian" and "outrageous" – while a user threatened to abandon the app from now on.

Meanwhile, in a one-star review on the app marketplace, a person named Natacha Jonsson said it felt "morally questionable".

"Based on my understanding of millennials, the majority have a long history of personal moments on the platform," they commented. "And most of us only kept the app mainly for that feature. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have a long timeline of moments... Goodbye to the app."

Furthermore, a London-based user, a university student media studies major in a major city, revealed on TikTok her plans to delete the app.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my archived media as soon as I could," she stated. "Almost all of my teenage years have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are really important to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to demand payment users for something that has been at no cost for a considerable period."

Uncertain Costs

The company has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would be priced at in the UK – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

Yet a young adult a different individual, who is based in London, said in a video on the social platform that she would be "distraught" by such charges.

She mentioned that the service had become "a regular habit" since she started using it in the past.

Despite admitting she understood the platform needed to generate revenue, the user suggested that the saved content option holds greater significance than the corporation may have anticipated.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust move to charge your subscribers who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our actual memories."

Professional Insight

Firms opting to impose fees from users for a feature that was previously free is nothing new, and millions pay for platforms like digital backup services to backup their images and clips from their smartphone.

The fact of keeping information in the digital storage – which certain experts in the digital field like to refer to as essentially "a remote system" – is that it involves expenses.

"Storing enormous quantities of Memories on the service isn't a trivial amount," online expert an industry analyst explained. "Snapchat has to try to find a approach to fund the operation of storage, data transfer, copies, file sharing, encryption – all that stuff."

However the expert noted that requiring payment for a feature that had once been complimentary, and subscribers had been invited to access as such, may appear as a "bait and switch" for some.

"Moving the goalposts after individuals have created this extensive stored content seems unfair," he explained. For numerous users, he stated, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're emotional artefacts."

The opinion was echoed by those submitting negative feedback, with a user labeling their archived media "extremely valuable to me".

"These archives contain all elements of my life within them from celebrations of new family members' births, sad moments of loss, memories with friends/family, [and] my complete adolescence," they commented.

Academic Insight

An academic expert, a university scholar at an educational establishment in the Holland, said that the company's action shows the consequences of commercial platforms being used to save sentimental personal content.

"They benefit from this trust, interdependence, and expectation of continuous entry, which even encourages certain individuals to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to scroll back through their archive," she informed the BBC. "However these are not charitable custodians of personal memory."